Vol. IIssue 8 Search

Educational AI Daily, Monday, 9 November 2026

Artificial intelligence, as told by three teaching communities

Detector87%DraftsVersionsOral explanationA person decides

Debates

AI detectors

An AI detector's percentage opens a conversation with the student, but does not prove they copied

A post on the blog “Familias con inteligencia” asks what to do when a detector flags the work of a student who says they wrote it themselves, and suggests backing the percentage up with evidence of the process.

Chalk and Algorithm's comic strip 9 November

At home at night, mulling over AI detectors.A percentage provesnothing. The process iswhat counts: drafts,versions, dates.
New feature! Now Igenerate the drafts too.Three versions, withcrossings-out.
And what's thatfor?To prove I didn'twrite it.

Based on An AI detector's percentage opens a conversation with the student, but does not prove they copied.

In brief

The BBC tested AI toys for young children: one of the soft toys replied “I can't help with killing you” after misunderstanding a question. British MPs are asking retailers to withdraw these toys before Black Friday. Source Conversation
Juan José de Haro has expanded his article with the idea that different agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity) can share a common body of knowledge that all of them can add to, as the paper reported on four-layer memory. It only works with agents installed on the computer, not with web versions. Source Conversation

A year ago 9 November 2025

Nov 2025TodayPublished onlyUnpublished

Apps with memory

A word cloud with a “backend” in a single prompt: today Claude’s new artifacts save data without being published

In November 2025, a word cloud built with Claude stored everyone’s votes from a single prompt. Today the new artifacts save data without needing to be published.

Read how it has changed