Vol. IIssue 8 Search

Educational AI Daily

Artificial intelligence, as told by three teaching communities

Detector87%DraftsVersionsOral explanationA person decides

Debates 9 November

AI detectors

An AI detector's percentage opens a conversation with the student, but does not prove they copied

A post on the blog “Familias con inteligencia” asks what to do when a detector flags the work of a student who says they wrote it themselves, and suggests backing the percentage up with evidence of the process.

In brief

9 November The BBC tested AI toys for young children: one of the soft toys replied “I can't help with killing you” after misunderstanding a question. British MPs are asking retailers to withdraw these toys before Black Friday. Source Conversation
9 November Juan José de Haro has expanded his article with the idea that different agents (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity) can share a common body of knowledge that all of them can add to, as the paper reported on four-layer memory. It only works with agents installed on the computer, not with web versions. Source Conversation

A year ago 9 November 2025

Nov 2025TodayPublished onlyUnpublished

Apps with memory

A word cloud with a “backend” in a single prompt: today Claude’s new artifacts save data without being published

In November 2025, a word cloud built with Claude stored everyone’s votes from a single prompt. Today the new artifacts save data without needing to be published.

Read how it has changed

Chalk and Algorithm's comic strip 9 November

At home at night, mulling over AI detectors.A percentage provesnothing. The process iswhat counts: drafts,versions, dates.
New feature! Now Igenerate the drafts too.Three versions, withcrossings-out.
And what's thatfor?To prove I didn'twrite it.

Based on An AI detector's percentage opens a conversation with the student, but does not prove they copied.

The Sunday feature 8 November

AI and age in the classroom

The age for using AI in class depends on three different rules: those of the companies, the law and the education authorities

Each service’s terms, data protection law and some education authorities set different ages for using artificial intelligence, and they are often confused. This report explains what each says as of 6 November 2026, why research asks us to swap the question of age for the question of purpose, and how a primary or secondary teacher can decide which tool to use, with which account, and who operates it.

Read the feature · 9 minute read

0131418 yearsCompaniesOpenAI and Microsoft: from 13Anthropic: from 18Gemini with a school account: all agesData lawOwn consent: from 14At school, no consent needed: educational functionSome education authoritiesCatalonia: the teacher operates the AIFrom 14: inform, authorisation advisableBasque Country: chatbots from 13Murcia: autonomous access from Year 3 of ESOWhat for? Which account? Who operates it?

Tools

Vibe coding

Multimedia

Debates

Under 14In Catalonia,the teacheroperates the AI14 to 18Inform: alwaysConsent: not neededAuthorisation: advised in CataloniaCompulsory if the toolrequires itIf a family objects,it only affects their child

7 NovemberFamilies and schools

Teachers debate whether families’ authorisation is needed to use AI with students

One school has limited generative AI with its students because some families did not authorise it; other views hold that simply informing them is enough. The rules are clear: families must be informed, but between 14 and 18 their consent is not needed unless the tool requires it.

Institutions & Industry

Library

Earlier briefs

7 November Luis Vilela Acuña released the open-source code of Liga de Valores, his app for school Physical Education leagues in which fair play, refereeing and the stands also score, with an installer to run it on the school's own network without an external server. He presents it in an article in the Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes. Source Conversation
7 November Antigravity, Google's agent-based programming environment, has run cloud projects managed from the browser since version 2.29 (3 November), instead of on the user's own computer; according to its changelog, it is rolling out to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. Source Conversation
6 November The XTEC page on AI links to the 2024 document as its guidance, with the note “Actualització prevista: des.26” (update expected: December 2026), and does not include the 45 guidelines from Catalonia that the paper reported. Source Conversation