Vol. IIssue 8 Search

Educational AI Daily

Artificial intelligence, as told by three teaching communities

Debates

What the groups discuss with arguments, such as assessment, authorship, privacy or the relationship with families. Positions are set out without attributing them to anyone and, when there are serious arguments on both sides, both are included.

Under 14In Catalonia,the teacheroperates the AI14 to 18Inform: alwaysConsent: not neededAuthorisation: advised in CataloniaCompulsory if the toolrequires itIf a family objects,it only affects their child

7 NovemberFamilies and schools

Teachers debate whether families’ authorisation is needed to use AI with students

One school has limited generative AI with its students because some families did not authorise it; other views hold that simply informing them is enough. The rules are clear: families must be informed, but between 14 and 18 their consent is not needed unless the tool requires it.

DetectorConversation and rulesIndication, not proof

2 NovemberAI detectors

Publishing industry warns of a “witch hunt” over AI text detectors

A La Vanguardia report describes accusations of AI use based on detectors whose verdicts contradict themselves over time. The debate reaches education: how to check authorship without hunting for culprits.